3 ms·
So since you're either a marketer or someone who works closely with them at least, I have a serious question. Why can't you guys be happy with simple, unintrusi
by FussyZeus 10y ago
So since you're either a marketer or someone who works closely with them at least, I have a serious question. Why can't you guys be happy with simple, unintrusive text ads on websites? Why do you need to bombard people with autoplay video, audio, etc. and annoy them to death? I have never heard of a single consumer who enjoys this experience yet it's employed by everyone.
- Le_SDT 10y agoI'm no marketer but nobody want to read an ad for fun. You have to shove it onto their face. Even if you are angry, now you know about the product and the idea of buying it might get to you later on. I guess it is something along those lines.
- FussyZeus 10y agoSee now I disagree with that, when it comes to for example, podcast ads, I don't mind them. They're usually read by the host of the podcast, it's done in a very clear "this is an ad, this company is helping us make this thing," it's not an attempt at trickery, it's not a lie, it's just there. And it's over and done with and I'm %10,000 more likely to follow up on one of those products (not to mention they're usually pretty relevant to the audience of whatever podcast). Advertising itself is not a bad thing, it's a critical part of any capitalist society. I just don't understand how we got to the point where seemingly every ad is as annoying as it could possibly be, that every ad company is just in a race to the bottom of "how can we be as intrusive and unsubtle as possible."
- Le_SDT 10y agoThere must be some kind of reward for doing this. Maybe there's a study about this kind of behaviour. But I get what you're saying. I feel the same. But like I said, there must be a reason.
- Daviey 10y agoNobody enjoys getting email spam, but it is still very popular.. why? Because it still works. Marketers aren't dumb.. they wouldn't invest so heavily in this if it wasn't effective.
- FussyZeus 10y agoTo be fair let's make a distinction between spam (scattershot bullshit emails that nobody has ever asked for) and actual marketed targeted advertising, which both my employer do (with double opt-in) and I myself respond to pretty regularly. In fact it got so bad I had to unsub from a few amazon emails because this time of year I'd see some silly thing in their email and be like "oh my mom would like one of those" and I racked up like $400 on my credit card over a week. Those are two different distinct forms of marketing, one of which I have no issue with, other than my impending financial ruin.
- hueving 10y ago>Marketers aren't dumb.. they wouldn't invest so heavily in this if it wasn't effective. So they're just unethical? Your logic can be used to justify a bunch of terrible things. >Nobody enjoys getting raped, but it is still very popular.. why? Because it still works. >Nobody enjoys getting scammed, but it is still very popular.. why? Because it still works. >Nobody enjoys getting robbed, but it is still very popular.. why? Because it still works.
- Daviey 10y agoNo.. this is an unreasonable argument. Whilst you might think garish adverts are unsavoury, I don't think you should compare it to illegal and terrible things such as rape.