I found it weird that the article claims that the lack of the definite article is the only sign that makes the machine-translated version of the Hemingway worse

I found it weird that the article claims that the lack of the definite article is the only sign that makes the machine-translated version of the Hemingway worse. OK, that's the only clinching evidence, but it's easy to spot how it's a lot more stilted in other respects, too. It's still impressive, mind, and a big improvement over the previous translation, but not perfect like the article wants to imply.