> I didn't follow when github started getting political. What happened? They suddenly decided to be a PC/feminist stronghold, with the associated reverse-logic

> I didn't follow when github started getting political. What happened? They suddenly decided to be a PC/feminist stronghold, with the associated reverse-logic, claiming words like "meritocracy" were actually oppressing and not empowering, and what not. http://readwrite.com/2014/01/24/github-meritocracy-rug/ http://readwrite.com/2014/01/24/github-meritocracy-rug/ After that stance was lost, you would every now and then read about just another piece about Github where PC politics were being inserted as Github policy. https://hacked.com/github-promotes-reverse-racism-sexism/ https://hacked.com/github-promotes-reverse-racism-sexism/ It's been a gradual, but noticeable process. You may or may not agree with the means/politics itself, but there should be no question that Github itself has been getting increasingly political recent years. And when you do that, you are bound to alienate someone. I, like many others, would prefer Github to remain a dumb/neutral service-provider. That's what I use it for. I don't need it to throw a political platform in my face.