4 ms·
Bummer! That'll throw a wrench in many the way many people I know use to share folders of files. Always a letdown when a company decides it has to make money.
by ljoshua 10y ago
Bummer! That'll throw a wrench in many the way many people I know use to share folders of files.
Always a letdown when a company decides it has to make money. ;)
- bigiain 10y agoIndeed - this is going to break a bunch of images in posts I've made to some forums I'm on that don't locally host images. Dropbox don't seem to be proposing any way to make existing public urls remain public. Not exactly unexpected I guess - when you put trust in a company continuing to do something for ever, you'll usually be disappointed. But being disappointed is the time you revisit your decision about whether to keep paying for Pro plans for a service that no longer does one of the things that's important to you.
- bigiain 10y agoAnd for the record, I got this email this morning, 15 days after I got the email where they charged me $129 again for my Pro account... I don't mind them charging money - it stings when they charge me money then take away one of the features I use and consider important... (I coulda hosted a _lot_ of forum-post-sized images on S3 for $129...)