3 ms·
I could put one together. Or you could read the last few years of posts at Fight Aging! and get the gist. But I'm pretty pro-SENS so it might not agree with you
by reasonattlm 10y ago
I could put one together. Or you could read the last few years of posts at Fight Aging! and get the gist. But I'm pretty pro-SENS so it might not agree with your preferences.
The short answer to your question is that the impact of everything viable that is not SENS is probably going to be about the same as exercise or calorie restriction in your life span if you are in the middle of life now. Which is to say +10 years if you pick the right things, and the people building those things do a good job. That would be, say, the combination of a couple of successes in things building upon mTOR or stem cell or telomerase therapies or etc. Not resveratrol, not 99% of the other pharmaceuticals, not 99% of the possible gene therapies, and not 99% of what people are trying to sell you.
- EGreg 10y agoWhat's SENS?
- grzm 10y agoStrategies for Engineered Negligible Senescence https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategies_for_Engineered_Negli https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategies_for_Engineered_Negl... gible_Senescence
- jgord 10y agoretry : Strategies_for_Engineered_Negligible_Senescence, here : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategies_for_Engineered_Negligible_Senescence https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategies_for_Engineered_Negl...
- grzm 10y agoCheers! Copy/paste fail. I'm usually good about testing, but obviously not this time.