2 ms·
I listened to their podcasts right from the start which doesn't qualify me to comment. But I will anyway. I'm just not sure this is the case. Joel seemed to ha
by reitzensteinm 17y ago
I listened to their podcasts right from the start which doesn't qualify me to comment. But I will anyway.
I'm just not sure this is the case. Joel seemed to have a much better grasp of the big picture. You could tell that he'd thought everything through really well, in the way that you'd expect from a successful business owner.
There's no doubt that Jeff did all the 'work' between the pair - Joel was mainly advising. But I would be very careful about writing off his contribution. I would personally bet a lot of money that Atwood going it alone would have been far less successful.
I'm not saying that Joel contributed more than Jeff either. When you look at two partners, and claim that one is more important than the other... that's a pretty big call to make. And unless you personally know them, I'm not sure you have the evidence to back it up.
- codingthewheel 17y agoFair enough. But don't you think the coverage in this particular article was a little Spolsky-centric? I agree they're a team (equals), and don't mean to imply Spolsky was a Johnny-come-lately, but the RWW article really just mentioned Atwood in passing. I thought it was a little strange that his name wasn't mentioned til below the fold but, no big deal.