3 ms·
Not saying this is bs or not but the source of this article is Zero Hedge. http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-12-15/revealed-who-gave-democratic-emails-wikileak
by cwisecarver 10y ago
Not saying this is bs or not but the source of this article is Zero Hedge. http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-12-15/revealed-who-gave-democratic-emails-wikileaks?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29 http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-12-15/revealed-who-gave-d...
- iooi 10y agoZH is using [1] as it's source, which reprinted the article from [2] [1] http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2016/12/64139.html http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2016/12/64139.html [2] https://consortiumnews.com/2016/12/12/us-intel-vets-dispute-russia-hacking-claims/ https://consortiumnews.com/2016/12/12/us-intel-vets-dispute-...
- kafkaesq 10y agoNo, ZH isn't the original source. Apparently the first reporting of (this part) of Murray's "disclosure" is an interview published yesterday in the Daily Mail: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4034038/Ex-British-ambassador-WikiLeaks-operative-claims-Russia-did-NOT-provide-Clinton-emails-handed-D-C-park-intermediary-disgusted-Democratic-insiders.html http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4034038/Ex-British-a... While unsupported, his account is not implausible. We'll see how it holds up.