3 ms·
In my teaching I try to distinguish between conventional-language numbering by saying "first", "second", "third"; from zero-based indexing by saying "zero-th",
by gshubert17 10y ago
In my teaching I try to distinguish between conventional-language numbering by saying "first", "second", "third"; from zero-based indexing by saying "zero-th", "one-th", "two-th", and so on.
It's a bit awkward, but once explained it is a quick way to tell the two numbering schemes apart.
- sparky_z 10y ago...unless you're working with indexes higher than 3. Or am I missing something?
- smnc 10y agoPerhaps they accentuate the difference via pronunciation or inflection. Otherwise I also fail to spot the difference.
- zAy0LfpBZLC8mAC 10y agoHmm, I dunno, I guess it might be a useful tool to explain the distinction? Not sure whether, in order to avoid long-term confusion, it would still be good to explain that, really, "first", "second", and so on, are the common words other people use for what you call "zero-th", "one-th", and so on?