> Besides being a subpar language that ignored the last 30 years of research at least Can beef that up with some arguments? The creators of Go are not ignorant

> Besides being a subpar language that ignored the last 30 years of research at least Can beef that up with some arguments? The creators of Go are not ignorant, they just decided consciously to create a language easy enough for recent graduates to be productive quickly. From a science point of view, the only valid reason why clojure cannot compile to Go is that nobody cared to implement that.[1] Well, either that, or the people who considered doing that realized that compiling a programming language to a Chinese board game is equivalent to using an abacus and abandoned the idea .... ;) [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turing_completeness https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turing_completeness