4 ms·
Cool, but I wish the author didn't put emphasis comparing the CSS3 animation with Flash. I don't think I've ever seen anything so bad in Flash. I know it's pos
by inerte 16y ago
Cool, but I wish the author didn't put emphasis comparing the CSS3 animation with Flash.
I don't think I've ever seen anything so bad in Flash. I know it's possible to do worse, but it's also so easy to do better.
Now we'll get people saying "Flash is still king" while the focus could be shifted to "Oh man CSS3 looks nice". The author is taunting but its attack could not be weaker.
- daleharvey 16y agoI can see your point, but its just a fun experiment completely abusing an unsuited technology, if someone can make a spiderman cartoon in css3, you can certainly make your div move from a to b in it.
- betageek 16y agoI think that sums up my feeling on the Flash v HTML5 arguments - if all you are doing is moving a div from A to B, CSS3/HTML5 is for you. If your actually doing some motion graphics that need fine grained control and high production values you aren't going to be moving away from Flash any time soon.
- daleharvey 16y agoI dont particularly agree, css3 was I am pretty sure never designed for animating cartoons. svg animation / html5 video or canvas however, are well suited to do a lot of the things currently done in flash.
- joshuarr 16y agoI agree except that this is infant tech at work. Do you happen to remember Flash 1 animations? Eeeew.
- aristus 16y agoI also remember Gabocorp. In the hands of a truly talented person anything is possible.
- not_an_alien 16y agoI guess that's my issue with it. I, for one, am impressed that this can all be done with CSS3, that framerate is pretty good, that image rotating and scaling has great quality, and all that. But with the guy taunting the "no flash!" thing so much, I can't help but compare the two and reach the conclusion that is way worse in all shape and form to what was possible with Flash 10 years ago, and much more so today.