3 ms·
Seems like a reckless statement on a couple of fronts. For one, it's openly disrespectful to the human drivers upon whom they've relied to this point--seemingly
by unclebucknasty 10y ago
Seems like a reckless statement on a couple of fronts. For one, it's openly disrespectful to the human drivers upon whom they've relied to this point--seemingly regarding them as nuisances which must be discarded post-haste.
And, of course, it begs the question: what would their response have been if it was due to a technical glitch, which may yet happen? Their statement could easily be used against them.
- jnky 10y ago> And, of course, it begs the question: what would their response have been if it was due to a technical glitch, which may yet happen? That's not a problem at all. They'll just use "git blame" and fire the programmer whose "human error" caused the accident.