> 3. The content, clearly GoT inspired, was likely posted in places that have agreements jeopardizing the ownership of said content and, yes i am stretching, co

> 3. The content, clearly GoT inspired, was likely posted in places that have agreements jeopardizing the ownership of said content and, yes i am stretching, copyright and trademark. You're not just stretching it, you're confusing the two. The law doesn't say anything about the need to protect trademark, only copyright. Additionally, there is nothing there to indicate that the artwork ("content" as you called it) has any inspiration from GoT. It's not based on a character from the show or the book and it doesn't depict an event or scene from either.