The article referenced is an example of propaganda by selecting the facts that fit the narrative. The authors conveniently fail to mention that there some areas

The article referenced is an example of propaganda by selecting the facts that fit the narrative. The authors conveniently fail to mention that there some areas on Earth that are actually cooling (Antarctica being the prime example [1], but there are others). Articles like the above are the reason why I don't trust research/finding being published anymore - at least not without full disclosure who paid for that research. The ugly truth is that scientists need money, and some have no problem manipulating data, per their sponsors' interests. This applies to both sides of the climate debate equally. [1] https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-07-20/antarctic-peninsula-cooled-in-past-two-decades-as-world-warmed https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-07-20/antarctic...