3 ms·
You don't have to live in San Francisco. There are plenty of nearby cities with cheaper rent.
by twblalock 10y ago
You don't have to live in San Francisco. There are plenty of nearby cities with cheaper rent.
- sbov 10y agoYeah, a lot of times people seem to talk past eachother because to them, SF = bay area. In reality it's a small portion of the population and even smaller portion of the land mass of the actual bay area.
- logfromblammo 10y ago...like Sacramento.~
- twblalock 10y agoEven San Mateo, which is not very far away, costs a lot less. And if you work in SF and commute from the East Bay via BART, which isn't too bad, you can save even more.
- jaf656s 10y agoNot sure why this was downvoted.. I live in Berkeley and a 2bdr here is cheaper than a studio in the city.
- st3v3r 10y agoBut then you'll have to likely sacrifice several hours of your day just to commuting.
- ohwello 10y agoI will let you in on a secret: there is a thing called BART, it can get you to a location with a fraction of the rent in 30 minutes.
- Sacho 10y agoIf you live in a nearby city, shouldn't you factor in transportation prices along with the rent?