4 ms·
> certainly data you're putting into a ring buffer is data you're willing to lose. When that's the case, a ring buffer is a great choice. It's not required, t
by dllthomas 10y ago
> certainly data you're putting into a ring buffer is data you're willing to lose.
When that's the case, a ring buffer is a great choice. It's not required, though - the writer could block when it detects a full buffer.