3 ms·
> But I am specifically talking about companies with closed source apps and services open sourcing them Ah, I see. I misunderstood. Yes, I think we are in agre
by Alupis 10y ago
> But I am specifically talking about companies with closed source apps and services open sourcing them
Ah, I see. I misunderstood. Yes, I think we are in agreement then, although I have my doubts most companies want their "secret sauce" or code-indiscretions flapping in the wild.
- IgorPartola 10y agoI think it depends. The exact PageRank algorithm, or the process that Uber uses to route drivers: probably not. The UI to any of that: why not? I think there is very little secret sauce out there and most of the stuff is just bog standard code that would do no harm being in the open.
- Alupis 10y agoCouldn't agree more. I think the largest hurdle for getting more stuff open sourced is two-fold. 1) A large amount of software is sub-par, and likely commits many atrocities including having business logic in the UI. 2) Companies are afraid they'll be embarrassed by their code, and would rather not take the risk of being branded as a company that doesn't do things right. For number 1, there are potential solutions by hiring better engineers etc... but number 2 is always a (perceived) risk, even if their codebase is "perfect".