6 ms·

I thought about that, but that would mean it's then probably not possible to review the images you've taken to ensure that you got the shot you wanted.... I gu

I thought about that, but that would mean it's then probably not possible to review the images you've taken to ensure that you got the shot you wanted.... I guess you could keep a second copy in a buffer somewhere, but I think however you handle this you either sacrifice a lot of usability or add quite a large vulnerability... There may be a more elegant solution I haven't thought of, however.

Johnny555 10y ago
My camera has a RAM buffer that images are stored in before it's flushed to the flash card. That doesn't help with reviewing 2 hours of video footage, but it does let you review the photo you just took before it's wiped from RAM.
- jfindley 10y ago
  All serious cameras do - but it's typically fairly small and most image review happens from the sd/cf card, not the buffer. I think if you have instant review on (I don't ever use this setting) then it MIGHT happen from buffer, but I'm not certain. Anyway - yes on the face of it this seems possible - but most pros I know will shoot a large chunk of images and review afterwards in a batch - they typically don't review often enough for this to really work, otherwise they'd risk missing shots while reviewing, which is why I thought that in practice it might be hard to implement this well enough without compromising security.
flashman 10y ago
> it's then probably not possible to review the images you've taken to ensure that you got the shot you wanted Well, photographers in the film era managed to get by.