4 ms·
What if you added a lot of "error-checking" code that kills the host when it doesn't produce enough of the valuable chemical? I'd guess this is very difficult i
by polyomino 10y ago
What if you added a lot of "error-checking" code that kills the host when it doesn't produce enough of the valuable chemical? I'd guess this is very difficult in practice.
Or also add a competing organism that "triggers" when the concentration of byproduct is too low?
- 88e282102ae2e5b 10y agoFor the first idea, you'd have to have some lethal protein or something that's specifically inhibited by the chemical of interest. Coming up with that might be even harder than the original problem. And even if you could, evolution wouldn't favor cells that produced it, since it confers no advantage. There's an energetic cost to making that protein. For the second idea, again, evolution ruins everything. The competing organism would do just that - compete.
- dnautics 10y agoBecause "you get what you select for". Instead of getting more of the chemical, you'll get a host that has hacked and disabled your error checking code.