3 ms·
They were real-world though. The Bulldozer architecture is optimal for some applications, just not very many that mattered at the time (and even now). I think t
by tormeh 10y ago
They were real-world though. The Bulldozer architecture is optimal for some applications, just not very many that mattered at the time (and even now). I think the architecture was just way ahead of its time. It anticipated the software practices of the future and tried to build a CPU for it within the confines of today. Such futurism is impressive, although kinda foolish, for such a capital-intensive product.
- Zardoz84 10y agoThe final result is that the Bulldozer and derivated cores, has aged very well. Any FX core works better now that they was released, because actually a lot of programs have in mind multicore that when the original FXs was released.