4 ms·
The comparison is valid because both are examples of people trying to justify their fears of what may happen because of what they see as a clear intent, when th
by peterwwillis 10y ago
The comparison is valid because both are examples of people trying to justify their fears of what may happen because of what they see as a clear intent, when there is no actual proof of intent.
The fact that a candidate may have asked for lists of client scientists after calling climate change a hoax, and that from this alone you extrapolate that he must be aiming to delete their data, is association fallacy.
- epistasis 10y ago>what they see as a clear intent, when there is no actual proof of intent. You have ignored the actual contents of my post. On one side of this, the "what" is nonexistent or completely fabricated. On the other side, there are unprecedented and chilling political demands. The view from 30,000 feet can make dissimilar things look similar, but that doesn't mean that it's the best view. Details matter.