4 ms·
Article is from nine months ago, actually. You have something negative to say on literally every Google-related article that appears on HN, but every one I've
by stuckagain 10y ago
Article is from nine months ago, actually. You have something negative to say on literally every Google-related article that appears on HN, but every one I've seen commits some factual or logical error. Why don't you give it a rest for a while?
- Oletros 10y agoHe seems to be in a Crusade against Google.
- ocdtrekkie 10y agoPlease refrain from personal attacks on HN. (cc: dang, if he gets magically tagged or something, I can't flag comments) Feel free to attack me on Twitter or Reddit or something.
- Oletros 10y agoWhich personal attacks? It is just a logical conclusion reading your comment history.
- ocdtrekkie 10y agoArticle was posted two hours ago on an account created today. So, while I may have missed it specifying it's a repost, it clearly remains accurate if they reposted it today. Maybe you should check for your own logical errors before criticizing others?