3 ms·
That is one side to the coin, however if you made a change that was a performance improvement yet the code was highly cryptic and hard for anyone else to unders
by scalesolved 10y ago
That is one side to the coin, however if you made a change that was a performance improvement yet the code was highly cryptic and hard for anyone else to understand then this wouldn't be a good thing.
Essentially what I'm getting at is that peer review from team members is the best metric for what is good and isn't.
- bertr4nd 10y agoAbsolutely true. Still, it helps when one side of the coin is precisely quantifiable, since it helps frame the more subjective questions like code complexity.