3 ms·
Sure, do you mind if I just link-dump? Otherwise let me know: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24819342 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24819342 https:
by croon 10y ago
Sure, do you mind if I just link-dump? Otherwise let me know:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24819342 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24819342
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16129086 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16129086
Low carb AND low fat https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3139783/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3139783/
This paper is often quoted when talking about eating regularly vs rarely (IF), in which the subjects were given meals with 70/15/15 of carbs/protein/fat, in which regular eaters consumed less: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10578205 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10578205
This is a paper on a similar trial with 60/14/26 and 49/25/26 macro comp instead, with opposite results (meaning you were full longer when eating less carbs): https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4034047/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4034047/