3 ms·
+1 there has been a discussion of making a sig-on-premise/sig-bare-metal (with a fair bit of opposition from others) [1]. Would help to have your comments the
by sandGorgon 10y ago
+1 there has been a discussion of making a sig-on-premise/sig-bare-metal (with a fair bit of opposition from others) [1]. Would help to have your comments there as well.
The biggest complication is around Ingress and load balancers. https://github.com/kubernetes/ingress/issues/23 https://github.com/kubernetes/ingress/issues/23
https://github.com/kubernetes/ingress/issues/17 https://github.com/kubernetes/ingress/issues/17
The problem is that many people point towards kube-the-hard way.. which is NOT production ready. For example scaling ingress itself - do you do deployments versus daemonset?
How do you set up ingresses to pass through source ip.
a lot of this is taken care for the cloud...but NOT for bare metal.
[1] https://groups.google.com/forum/m/?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer#!msg/kubernetes-dev/ztVnvbrpTK8/-R4PlfHVBwAJ https://groups.google.com/forum/m/?utm_medium=email&utm_sour...
- jcastro 10y agosig-onprem is coming, it was decided at the last community meeting, expect an announcement soonish.
- elcct 10y agoIt also has problems with using certificates when reporting etcd health: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/27343 https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/27343 I was writing a blog about installing it on bare metal, but this issue got me blocked.
- sandGorgon 10y agocould you ping on slack on sig-cluster-ops? thats the defacto meeting ground for bare metal issues. Though honestly i think it is a fundamental issue and not specifically related to BM.