8 ms·
It interferes with a goal of replacing the model entirely. Since it's already clear that academics pay dearly to do this (let alone doing it for free!) it's no
by Natsu 10y ago
It interferes with a goal of replacing the model entirely. Since it's already clear that academics pay dearly to do this (let alone doing it for free!) it's not clear that the journals add anything but prestige, so anything we can do to eliminate that for a model will allow everyone full access to the literature.
If the effort currently wasted here could be redirected into making research available to all, it would be good for everyone except the publishers.