4 ms·
It would be in isolation, but it would also make it hard for people to replace that income if they came to depend on it.
by Natsu 10y ago
It would be in isolation, but it would also make it hard for people to replace that income if they came to depend on it.
- Ericson2314 10y agoSure. For the near term that is not an issue. Longer term at least the company is offering more of a service
- Natsu 10y agoIt interferes with a goal of replacing the model entirely. Since it's already clear that academics pay dearly to do this (let alone doing it for free!) it's not clear that the journals add anything but prestige, so anything we can do to eliminate that for a model will allow everyone full access to the literature. If the effort currently wasted here could be redirected into making research available to all, it would be good for everyone except the publishers.
- 08-15 10y agoSo you would become a professional reviewer. Sounds like a reasonable career choice to me.