3 ms·
And absolutely needlessly so. You can ship a fully compliant USB-C 3.1 cable for probably 40 cents more than a cheap version. It makes no sense to start a rol
by phil21 10y ago
And absolutely needlessly so. You can ship a fully compliant USB-C 3.1 cable for probably 40 cents more than a cheap version. It makes no sense to start a rollout this way, especially from a company like Apple.
- tedunangst 10y agoWhat about Apple's cables makes them noncompliant?
- lobster_johnson 10y agoThe charge cable is USB 2.0, I believe. It's not that it's not compliant, it's just intended for charging only.
- m_mueller 10y agoAs someone watching this mess from the sidelines (no intention to buy a computer within a year) I think this annoys me much more than all the other problems reported so far. How can they make a mess out of their own lineup of a newly launched port so much? Inexcusable.
- whywhywhywhy 10y ago> You can ship a fully compliant USB-C 3.1 cable for probably 40 cents more than a cheap version. It makes no sense to start a rollout this way, especially from a company like Apple You're talking about the company that no longer ships power cables with a little plastic clip to keep them tidy and now sells the extended lead as an extra, both of which have been in every one of their laptop chargers for 15 years+
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- drcongo 10y agoTo be fair, that plastic wind up clip was almost certainly the primary cause of failure in the old power bricks. Anyone who has ever worked as a roadie knows that that's an entirely wrong way to wind a cable.
- dmtroyer 10y agoalso, to be fair, I wonder how many of the extensions died in the box.