2 ms·
I get that in academia there is a standard publication path for thought and insight in the form of scientific papers. It's a cool thing. Scientific papers are
by socmag 10y ago
I get that in academia there is a standard publication path for thought and insight in the form of scientific papers.
It's a cool thing.
Scientific papers are not everyone's cup of tea though, and somewhat inaccessible (to publish for) for older people or those outside of academia.
Surely there is a middle ground between "JavaScript for Dummies", "Studies in Global Illumination" and "Computation on the modular hypersphere"
Actually, I'll be frank. Academic papers are designed to be inaccessible. Not all, but the majority. I've read plenty in Comp.Sci, and all I can say is that going out of their way to be obtuse seems like more than a fascination. I think it is called "Job Security"
Heck for the longest time, academic papers were behind paywalls that were WAY more inaccessible than Elsevier.
So there is that.
- pmyteh 10y agoIt's a problem. The incentives are for getting published, not getting read. We are somewhat rewarded for producing accessible content in the form of teaching, but anything popular in writing (even if scholarly and read by millions) just isn't quite recognised. And that deliberate obscurity is a thing, though not a universal one. And that is evil.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]