3 ms·
I'd be happiest if he didn't exist, quite frankly. But either way -- it's fine for him, as a human being, if he still needs to look up in an encyclopedia, or "
by kafkaesq 10y ago
I'd be happiest if he didn't exist, quite frankly.
But either way -- it's fine for him, as a human being, if he still needs to look up in an encyclopedia, or "ask an expert" what nuclear weapons are really useful for -- or whether the U.S. still has access to them.
But if he's that far out on the "happy-ignorant-foolish" spectrum -- then I'd greatly, greatly prefer that he not be placed in charge of the disposition of such instruments.
Are you with me on this?
- ars 10y agoNo, I am not. I'm not happy with everything he's said and done. But unlike you I'm not so quick to dismiss people as "happy-ignorant-foolish" just because they don't agree with me. If you are incapable of understanding why people act in a certain way when it differs from yours then that's your failure, not theirs. PS. It's clear from your reply that you did not understand what I wrote in my previous message, in fact you seemed to understand almost exactly the opposite of what I wrote. Is that my fault for not being clear? Or are you uninterested in understanding Trump any other way?
- kafkaesq 10y agoI'm not so quick to dismiss people as "happy-ignorant-foolish" just because they don't agree with me. I'm quick to dismiss them in that way based on what they say and do -- for example, running or the office of President of the United states, whilst not possessing even a middle-school level knowledge of whether the country you wish to govern actually has nuclear weapons or not; let alone what they are actually useful for -- not because they "disagree with [me]".