3 ms·
> but Darwinists won't admit this because "religion". I don't see how that follows. "Religion" doesn't just make the claim that there is a creator and leaves i
by skc 10y ago
> but Darwinists won't admit this because "religion".
I don't see how that follows. "Religion" doesn't just make the claim that there is a creator and leaves it at that. In fact I'd have more respect for religion if it did.
- Cyph0n 10y agoWhat I mean is that Darwinism's extreme anti-religion stance means that it won't accept any idea that even has a tiny whiff of creationism. This is why some Darwinists are going with the simulation argument to address the shortcomings of the theory. Take a look at the kind of criticism the ID movement has been getting. Their whole argument is that "something" must have designed the universe. They do not explicitly argue for a God, and some proponents even accept the simulation argument! Nonetheless, Darwinisim wouldn't touch ID with a 60-foot stick.