4 ms·
Poorly written title/article (if you can call it that). At least it contains a link to ieee.org with more content [1]. See also arstechnica [2][3] for some earl
by mxvzr 10y ago
Poorly written title/article (if you can call it that). At least it contains a link to ieee.org with more content [1]. See also arstechnica [2][3] for some earlier coverage.
[1] http://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-talk/semiconductors/devices/selfhealing-transistors-for-chipscale-starships http://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-talk/semiconductors/devices/se...
[2] http://arstechnica.com/science/2016/04/breakthrough-starshot-announces-plans-to-send-ship-to-alpha-centauri/ http://arstechnica.com/science/2016/04/breakthrough-starshot...
[3] http://arstechnica.com/science/2016/08/could-breakthrough-starshots-ships-survive-the-trip/ http://arstechnica.com/science/2016/08/could-breakthrough-st...
- sctb 10y agoThanks, we've updated the link from https://futurism.com/this-self-healing-tech-could-let-us-reach-the-closest-alien-stars-in-just-20-years/ https://futurism.com/this-self-healing-tech-could-let-us-rea....
- zodPod 10y agoAre you saying you work at futurism? Can you address the annoying newsletter nag that happens when you load the page the first time? It may be mostly "inconsequential" but in an internet where we are constantly bombarded with annoying forms interrupting our reading, bothering us to give up our information, can't you try to be better than that?
- sctb 10y agoAh, I see the ambiguity here. I work on Hacker News, so I updated the link of this submission to the ieee.org article, which was linked to by the futurism.com one. (Sorry to disappoint about the nags)