3 ms·
Except as you and I have argued about in the past, "notability" is redundant. Wikipedia already requires verifiable information from reliable sources. That shou
by ubernostrum 10y ago
Except as you and I have argued about in the past, "notability" is redundant. Wikipedia already requires verifiable information from reliable sources. That should be the only bar.
"Notability" introduces a way to subjectively say "well, yes, this is verifiable information from reliable sources, but I don't like this subject, so it shouldn't be allowed anyway". No amount of hand-waving can change the fact that this is what the criterion is used to do, and it makes Wikipedia a laughingstock when coupled with its protestations of neutrality.