3 ms·

Actually my original title was more precise because it included "(1611)" which should make that clear. But, apparently, it got changed.

• user982 10y ago
  Well of course it did, it was more than four centuries off.
  • forbiddenlake 10y ago
    (1611) is November 2016, not the year.
    • cyphar 10y ago
      On HN, titles are appended with (YYYY) to indicate the year of the article. So, it was a joke. :P
    • noja 10y ago
      Phew then it isn't my abacus that is broken!
      • masmullin 10y ago
        One does not preclude the other, your abacus could still be broken.
• sctb 10y ago
  Thanks, we've reverted the title to full one from the linked page.
  • sofaofthedamned 10y ago
    May have been better to stick '7.3' in there to avoid the confusion I and others have had.
    • sctb 10y ago
      OK, done.