3 ms·
No, we actually use ML. We just don't need to, in my opinion, because the problems our products solve are more or less solvable without these techniques. My po
by sidlls 10y ago
No, we actually use ML. We just don't need to, in my opinion, because the problems our products solve are more or less solvable without these techniques.
My point was that using ML, even though we don't need to, "adds value" by virtue of the hype train. We need ML to sell products, not to create them.
I do agree that this sort of arrangement lends itself to supporting skepticism around AI and ML. On the other hand I don't think that's a bad thing.
- AndrewKemendo 10y agoGot it. Thanks for the clarification. It is true that people are using ML where other, simpler options are available, but I wouldn't immediate discount the value of using nets for your problem. I don't know enough about your problem/implementation to speak to it really.
- sidlls 10y agoYes, thanks for highlighting the deficiency in my original post. I can see it is easily interpretated as you did. I added a clarification (or what I hope is one).
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]