Probably being a Uighur or Tibetan in their respective regions regions. Also faces might correspond to certain disadvantaged ethnicities or groups. Or they migh

Probably being a Uighur or Tibetan in their respective regions regions. Also faces might correspond to certain disadvantaged ethnicities or groups. Or they might even correspond to a genotype that is expressed as a phenotype, so a genetic basis. We have identified a certain gene that makes aggression much more likely. And apparently it's more prevalent in African Americans in the US than others. But even that has context. In certain countries beating someone up, i.e. physical assault, is glossed over. Crime is highly subjective in terms of what people are willing to put up with... anything more than thou shalt not kill is highly subjective, and even that's ignored by military all around the world all the time. Good quote: Indeed, that was an apt and true reply which was given to Alexander the Great by a pirate who had been seized. For when that king had asked the man what he meant by keeping hostile possession of the sea, he answered with bold pride, "What do you mean by seizing the whole earth; because I do it with a petty ship, I am called a robber, while you who does it with a great fleet are styled emperor".