6 ms·
because 99% of the available work can be done by inexperienced kids. Now spend some time thinking about the qualifications necessary for commenting and where
by Noseshine 10y ago
because 99% of the available work can be done by
inexperienced kids.
Now spend some time thinking about the qualifications necessary for commenting and where you stand in that field, and what's the difference between what you produced and what a Senior Commenter would produce.
- irq11 10y agoAre you seriously suggesting that a senior person wouldn't use the words "inexperienced kids" to describe inexperienced kids? Or are you just trying to make a low-brow insult look intellectual? Come on. Being "senior" doesn't mean that you start blowing smoke to please random strangers.
- Noseshine 10y agoI am seriously suggesting that a Senior Commenter would produce more intelligent and more enjoyable content compared to the no-effort nonsense you managed to come up with. Have a nice day.
- acedinlowball 10y agoWow. We need fewer people like you on HN. You are awful.
- dang 10y agoThis sort of personal attack will get your account banned on HN, so please don't do this. You've posted a lot of unsubstantive comments already, and some uncivil ones too. That's not good. Please (re)-read the site rules and post civilly and substantively, or not all, from now on: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newswelcome.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newswelcome.html
- dang 10y agoThis sort of uncivil comment will get your account banned on HN, so please post civilly and substantively from now on.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- Noseshine 10y agoDon't pester good contributors like me needlessly with childish and useless threats (my comment history is open for all to see). You can tell that to the OP (as you already did). My reply is not "uncivil" but perfectly appropriate, and my comment history suggests you are doing yourself no favor indiscriminately throwing ban-warnings around.
- dang 10y agoNo doubt most of your comments have been fine, but "the no-effort nonsense you managed to come up with" was a breach of HN's civility rule. The commenter you were replying to broke the rule too, but under such conditions we need to be more civil, not less, to avoid a downward spiral.
- dang 10y agoThis comment breaks the HN guidelines. Please post civilly and substantively, or not at all. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newswelcome.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newswelcome.html
- dang 10y agoWe detached this subthread from https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13156608 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13156608 and marked it off-topic.
- Noseshine 10y agoSo I checked in an anonymous window to see what you did - you moved the parent post and some of its sub-posts, but my reply to the guy still is here, now as top-level comment without context. That makes no sense!
- dang 10y agoThat's how we handle off-topic subthreads on HN. It has context because we provide a link to the place it originally was.
- Noseshine 10y agoThat's not what I meant. You didn't detach the subthread - you detached the thread and a sub-subthread but left another sub-subthread - my post - and now it has become the top-comment, replacing the former comment it was a reply to. You destroyed the thread structure and now it's an incomprehensible mess - who responded to whom? Now the original post that I replied to is available as link BELOW the reply! Why not shift the ENTIRE sub-thread instead of parts of it?