4 ms·
It seems to be in large part due to (1) articles that require strong background knowledge tend to only be edited by appropriately knowledgeable authorities (e.g
by joatmon-snoo 10y ago
It seems to be in large part due to (1) articles that require strong background knowledge tend to only be edited by appropriately knowledgeable authorities (e.g. higher level maths, quantum dynamics) and (2) editing privileges for highly controversial articles tends to be very tightly controlled.
There's also an interesting trend wherein Wikipedia editors tend to drift to the political center: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/10/25/somethings-terribly-wrong-with-the-internet-and-wikipedia-might-be-able-to-fix-it/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/10/25/somet...
- fjdlwlv 10y agoThe mystery is why wikipedia hasn't been hijacked by rogue editors yet. What is the defense mechanism? Do the original founders still have ultima control? Have they carefully chosen deputies?