> While it's important that we respect and include those people, it's also true that had a human animator produced the same work, we should see the same respons

> While it's important that we respect and include those people, it's also true that had a human animator produced the same work, we should see the same response. Not necessarily. I suppose he might be commenting on how depicting that particular movement in such a way might be a choice taken by a "human animator" to achieve an end goal or to evoke a certain (rational or emotional or a combination of the two) response from the viewer (hopefully in context of a greater goal/story). The default response here would be that the animation sequence in question is something that should serve as input or inspiration to the artist(s) creating the movie/video/artproduct/whatever and unlock some previously untappable source in their imagination. The question that then arises is "What if the artist is also an AI" (whatever we currently mean when we say "AI"). Does that change anything?