3 ms·
If ads weren't the primary source of malware I'd at least be willing/able to turn the ad blocker off on sites I like and want to support that have non-intrusive
by SAI_Peregrinus 10y ago
If ads weren't the primary source of malware I'd at least be willing/able to turn the ad blocker off on sites I like and want to support that have non-intrusive ads.
- jancsika 10y agoOk. So you keep the blocker on, but you allow ads on the subset of sites that fit the following criteria: 1. You like and trust the site 2. You want to support the site 3. You trust that the ads displayed on the site are non-intrusive (and if they cease to be that you start blocking ads again) Does anyone know if such a model would generate enough revenue for the web as it exists today to stay in business? Because even if ads become less risky and less intrusive, there's no going back to allowing arbitrary ads from arbitrary sites. Your model seems about as promiscious as a responsible user could be going forward.