3 ms·
Yeah I agree with what you're saying. But I was talking about this part: > Needless to say, it definitely made me look at Yik Yak differently. As I said, that
by cocktailpeanuts 10y ago
Yeah I agree with what you're saying. But I was talking about this part:
> Needless to say, it definitely made me look at Yik Yak differently.
As I said, that's messed up that the guy thought that way but I don't think it's the company's fault. I can do the same for my employer what this guy did since I have access to a lot of private information, but that's my fault, not the company's fault for trusting their employee.
- kevinwang 10y agoI suppose the op of the story is saying that the company Yik Yak IS its employees, which, especially for a small company, is pretty true. Isn't a company just === people that work for it?
- cocktailpeanuts 10y agoI really don't know how you reach that conclusion. This one unethical guy who doesn't even work there anymore, who's not even one of the founders, makes unethical decisions. And suddenly the entire company he used to work for--which really did nothing wrong and has nothing to do with this guy's behavior--is unethical?