3 ms·
Except it is. I have worked on a couple of react/redux production projects and they all work well, but I still think redux is way too convoluted for most use ca
by cocktailpeanuts 10y ago
Except it is. I have worked on a couple of react/redux production projects and they all work well, but I still think redux is way too convoluted for most use cases. Too many abstract concepts.
Also their naming of the features could have been better. For example "reducer" makes sense ONLY after you understand what's going on. It should be the other way around--the naming should be intuitive enough to actually help me understand the concept easier.
A lot of physics theories are distilled down to a single equation, but that doesn't mean it's simple concept to understand. I personally think a library with 10000 lines of code that operate using setters and getters is much more simple to understand than a library with 100 lines of code that has all these esoteric concepts.