OK, by revenue, sure. But calling it "pure and utter bullshit" is probably going a little far, don't you think? (Where is the line item for "AI"? Datacenter and

OK, by revenue, sure. But calling it "pure and utter bullshit" is probably going a little far, don't you think? (Where is the line item for "AI"? Datacenter and Auto? Not to mention many "gaming" cards are more than sufficient for "AI" if you don't need 64bit FP.) Intel has been hammering at the GPU screw for more than a decade and by all rights, they still haven't figured out how to use a screwdriver (to use Huang's characterization of Intel's approach). Nvidia, meanwhile, has built a massively parallel beast that's still decent at gaming. But make no mistake; their engineering priorities are set on general parallel computation. Gaming performance is in many ways a similar problem, and thus benefits, but it would be a mistake to think games still come first for their engineers.