3 ms·
I'll point out that this same argument applied to discrete GPUs when Intel tried to enter the market with Larrabee (before giving up and claiming that HPC was w
by boulos 10y ago
I'll point out that this same argument applied to discrete GPUs when Intel tried to enter the market with Larrabee (before giving up and claiming that HPC was where it's at anyway).
"This time is different" might apply here though, because training is "just" a lot of low precision matrix math. This requires a lot less new ecosystem / software for Intel (Intel has a long history in matrix math), so much like SSE, AVX, and now AVX-512 (or as I still call it LRBni) Intel can easily make some tweaks to at least get 70% of the gains.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- sgift 10y agoAlso: Intel learned many things with Larabee. Larabee may have been a failure in public perception, but for Intel it seems to have been a fruitful experience which still helps them. (Somewhere, I've read that they've won the contract for one of the next super computers based on their Knights Landing architecture)