4 ms·

Basically React seemed immature, as if it wasn't thought out fully but just hacked together. Vuejs seems like what React could've been if it was thought out a

Basically React seemed immature, as if it wasn't thought out fully but just hacked together. Vuejs seems like what React could've been if it was thought out a Bit more. It just feels a lot more polished. Honestly I think Vue is so far ahead of the curve it isn't a surprise to see more people switch away from React.

danabramov 10y ago
I wouldn’t say React is “hacked together”. Perhaps you are referring to the React ecosystem? Facebook doesn’t build single-page apps with React, so naturally it doesn’t provide solutions for routing and similar concerns, so there is more churn as people are figuring this out together.
- simonw 10y ago
  Could you expand more on "Facebook doesn't build single-page apps in React"? I hadn't heard that before.
  - lucasmullens 10y ago
    Like, facebook.com isn't one big single-page React app. They use it for specific pages/features.
- deleted 10y ago
  [deleted]
- irrational 10y ago
  Wait, do people use React for non-SPA websites?
  - Ralfp 10y ago
    Yep! I find myself using React.js for complex forms/wizards on non-SPA websites far more often than using it to build SPAs.
  - phpnode 10y ago
    Of course, hence the focus on server-side rendering. It is quite difficult to do properly though. Facebook itself is not a single page application.
  - ioseph 10y ago
    Absolutely! I'm current using it for a entirely back-end routed Symfony app. It's perfect for any front-end stuff complex enough that jQuery would become a mess.
  - tnjm 10y ago
    I use React all the time for individual components on server-rendered pages. It feels like a natural extension to formerly monolithic Rails/Node/etc apps. That said, when an SPA is called for I'd far rather use Ember and get routing, state and a hundred other things for free, without needing to bolt together an entire front-end framework from parts each time.
- keyanzhang 10y ago
  Isn't https://messenger.com https://messenger.com a SPA?
ng12 10y ago
I completely disagree. Vue seems like a step backwards for me -- it does very little that I couldn't do with Backbone/Marionette. I don't want templates, I don't want data-binding, and I DEFINITELY don't want opaque directives in my HTML.

danabramov 10y ago

I wouldn’t say React is “hacked together”. Perhaps you are referring to the React ecosystem? Facebook doesn’t build single-page apps with React, so naturally it doesn’t provide solutions for routing and similar concerns, so there is more churn as people are figuring this out together.

simonw 10y ago
Could you expand more on "Facebook doesn't build single-page apps in React"? I hadn't heard that before.
- lucasmullens 10y ago
  Like, facebook.com isn't one big single-page React app. They use it for specific pages/features.
deleted 10y ago
[deleted]
irrational 10y ago
Wait, do people use React for non-SPA websites?
- Ralfp 10y ago
  Yep! I find myself using React.js for complex forms/wizards on non-SPA websites far more often than using it to build SPAs.
- phpnode 10y ago
  Of course, hence the focus on server-side rendering. It is quite difficult to do properly though. Facebook itself is not a single page application.
- ioseph 10y ago
  Absolutely! I'm current using it for a entirely back-end routed Symfony app. It's perfect for any front-end stuff complex enough that jQuery would become a mess.
- tnjm 10y ago
  I use React all the time for individual components on server-rendered pages. It feels like a natural extension to formerly monolithic Rails/Node/etc apps. That said, when an SPA is called for I'd far rather use Ember and get routing, state and a hundred other things for free, without needing to bolt together an entire front-end framework from parts each time.
keyanzhang 10y ago
Isn't https://messenger.com https://messenger.com a SPA?

ng12 10y ago

I completely disagree. Vue seems like a step backwards for me -- it does very little that I couldn't do with Backbone/Marionette. I don't want templates, I don't want data-binding, and I DEFINITELY don't want opaque directives in my HTML.