Very nice investigation. The conclusion is golden: Retract the article? If, as in this case, there is no question of scientific malpractice, that would be high

Very nice investigation. The conclusion is golden: Retract the article? If, as in this case, there is no question of scientific malpractice, that would be highly unusual. However, one or two critical responses may be added to Jan Vijg’s article. One such response is currently under peer review. “I hope Nature accepts one of them,” says Vijg on the phone. Because then he’ll get to write a response. “And we’ll have another article in Nature.”