3 ms·
This 57% sounds horribly wrong. They don't really explain how they come to this conclusion here: https://w3techs.com/technologies https://w3techs.com/technologi
by kowdermeister 10y ago
This 57% sounds horribly wrong. They don't really explain how they come to this conclusion here: https://w3techs.com/technologies https://w3techs.com/technologies
My gut feeling is that 57% is a huge number if you assume that they don't use a CMS. I don't think that's manageable by the average owner with static site generators. None of my clients would be able to update their site with GIT + text editors. It's more likely that there's some kind of backend system that the survey was unable to identify.
- ohyoutravel 10y agoThis is kind of what got me. I feel like the majority of people wouldn't be savvy enough to do a site without a CMS as the setup is a little involved, or at least more involved than the simplicity of going to Wordpress.com and starting a site. So I don't know if I'm just missing something major here, or if the data is off.
- michaelbuckbee 10y agoWell, that's 57% that they could identify and that they happened to classify that way. There are lots of ways to obscure what's running and many more platforms out there.