>Not sure why you're making that leap. It's free speech regardless of the existence of an audience. To clarify, I'm arguing the way others argue so if doesn't

>Not sure why you're making that leap. It's free speech regardless of the existence of an audience. To clarify, I'm arguing the way others argue so if doesn't seem logical to you, I totally agree! When you tell people who are censored on places like Facebook to just go make their own website, they'll respond with the analogy: "freedom to shout opinions in my own living room where nobody else can hear it is NOT FREE SPEECH!" Using that logic, that's why they insist putting the "public space" label on Facebook/reddit/twitter. It's not good enough that DNS+ISP is the "public space". Instead, it must be somebody else's website that already has an audience of millions.