I think the point of PureScript was to have a Haskell that would compile to JS, but which (unlike GHCJS) would have breaking changes to integrate better with JS

I think the point of PureScript was to have a Haskell that would compile to JS, but which (unlike GHCJS) would have breaking changes to integrate better with JS features. Trying to look like JavaScript might be a bit hard then... That said, I'm curious about what sorts of things you think they could have done to have a more JS-like syntax. Any ideas?