3 ms·
While the claim of selection bias in JetBrains' survey may be argued, it is still a valid data source, which is what the gp was asking for. Also, your anecdota
by RedCrowbar 10y ago
While the claim of selection bias in JetBrains' survey may be argued, it is still a valid data source, which is what the gp was asking for.
Also, your anecdotal data is arguably biased as well.
My take is that many sources, including the ones linked to in the tweet's replies point to solid growth in Python 3 adoption. Python3 might not have overtaken Python 2 overall, but it's very far from being "dead".
- godelski 10y ago>My take is that many sources, including the ones linked to in the tweet's replies point to solid growth in Python 3 adoption. Python3 might not have overtaken Python 2 overall, but it's very far from being "dead". I wasn't making the point that Python 2 is dead, in fact quite the opposite. I'm saying that with this many users the adoption rate is too slow. There is no real reason for people to switch. Until there is that incentive Python 2 will not die.
- coldtea 10y ago>While the claim of selection bias in JetBrains' survey may be argued, it is still a valid data source, which is what the gp was asking for. No, I asked for a representative data source (representative was implied: a biased data source is as good as no data source at all).