3 ms·
I was certainly very interested in this concept. I admit my instant reaction was one of complete repugnance. Human communication comprises a huge array of diffe
by scandox 10y ago
I was certainly very interested in this concept. I admit my instant reaction was one of complete repugnance. Human communication comprises a huge array of different things, the minority of which have to do with abstract reasoning. IQ is a very specific measure of one aspect of human intelligence.
In a sense this concept (the window of comprehension), reductive as it seems, would be more likely to reinforce the problems the individuals mentioned have, by emphasizing human communication as an intellectual rather than a social activity.
In general my experience of very intelligent people is that they have an excellent ability to interact with people of all types, including people with relatively undeveloped powers of abstract thought. After all understanding context is to my mind a strong indicator of intelligence.
On the other hand I'd be interested to hear more from people of very high IQ on this topic - if they think they can get their ideas across to me over the 30 point barrier
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- rabidrat 10y agoThe key here is "meaningful". I'm not sure about 145 talking to 115, but I can imagine that 115 talking to 85 would be downright painful. We would just not care about the same things.
- scandox 10y agoThought experiment: you're the last two humans. You've an IQ of 115 and the other person has an IQ of 85. In my imagination a hell of a lot of that difference would become meaningless within the first week or so.